Jump to content
MONALISAISMONALUCY

What episodes are you watching on "I Love Lucy"?

Recommended Posts

Neil    1,325
On 2/3/2019 at 9:43 PM, Mot Morenzi said:

Lucy Misses the Mertzes - A touching episode, but rather slow in pace. It's rare to see such a quiet episode with so little action. I do like how it cements the closeness of their friendships, though.

Lucy Gets Chummy With the Neighbors - A good introduction to the Ramseys, and (IMO) the best of the new furniture episodes. I wish Frank Nelson had made more appearances as Ralph, he was quite good in the part. Lucy did have a point - their NYC furniture did not suit that house. 

These are both great ones.  An I Love Lucy episode didn't need a big physical comedy scene to be memorable.  I know of no other series that was able to combine touching and  wildly hilarious episodes, sometimes the same one.  (Some might convincingly argue "All in the Family" did it, but their serious episodes could be a bit ham-handed IMO.)  

Before the days of reference books and episode guides, sometimes you would only catch an episode here and there.  And these syndicated prints sometimes unceremoniously lopped off the first 5 minutes.    I remember seeing one of these moving to the country episodes and assumed the Mertzes were being written out of the show.   Adjusted for inflation, Lucy's furniture expenditure was over $31,000!  No wonder she collapsed in that rocking chair, one of my favorite bits in that episode.   The premise of Lucy mistaking stock numbers for prices was very clever.  

Poor Ethel.after 15 years of being a part of the excitement Lucy brought to her life,  then being left with lumpy, sags-in-the-wrong-places Fred, I would cry too!  When reference books first started being published, Frank Nelson was listed as a 1957 regular despite the fact his Ralph Ramsey appeared in only TWO episodes.  (Am I right?).  Bobbie the Bellboy appeared in more!

"Mot": Were there many "new furniture" episodes?  I only remember one other one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mot Morenzi    1,467

Let me see. There was the phone giveaway episode in season 2. Then we had Lucy Wants New Furniture the following year, and she gave her old stuff to the Mertzes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neil    1,325

Mot inspired me to rewatch the episodes "Misses the Mertzes" and "Chummy with Neighbors" (also "Hates to Leave").   The bit is "Misses" about just missing each other at the train station was done again in "No More Double Dates" and "Serves a Summons" from TLS season 1 and 2.  I think it works each time.  Very well choreographed.  I can't think of another time it was done.   (I'm not counting in this category where people are in the same house but don't know the other is there like "Summer Vacation" ---a bit repeated in "The Carol Channing Show" pilot).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Freddie2    828

"The Diner" is an episode that doesn't work as well as I remember it. Beyond the slight logic bump of Ricky hastily deciding to quit showbusiness entirely with Lucy's support and the Mertzes agreeing to partner with them at the restaurant (whatever happened to never doing business with friends?), the whole thing feels kind of clunky. A lot of it has to do with the technical aspects of the episode, the sound mixing is wonky with a lot of ADR and there seems to be more pickup shots than usual. It doesn't help that the shape of the diner set appears to be very awkward for the camera setup. The shot of the Ricardos and the Mertzes poised with pies on opposing sides of the counter should be an iconic image from the show. In fact, you'd think that a pie fight would be among the most memorable of the series' sight gags, but I feel like the whole thing is sub-par (for Lucy standards of course). Compare this with the rest of season three, which is easily the "smallest" of all the seasons but is still remarkably consistent and funny. 

Side Note: The gang pays $2,000 total for the diner, which would amount to around $18,000 today. Unless that was just a down payment, it's a remarkably small sum. Assuming that the restaurant was within several blocks of their building, even the smallest business would cost way more today. Their 15 cent hamburgers translate to $1.40 in 2019. Nowadays if someone in Manhattan offered me a hamburger for less than $5, I wouldn't trust it!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mot Morenzi    1,467

Good observations. I like how you describe season three as the smallest. I take it you mean in terms of "event" episodes? If so, you're right that it's content just to play with things as they are, and isn't trying to constantly shake things up.

I love how settled everyone feels this season. Lucy and Ricky have the baby and the new apartment, and are obviously happy with what they have (except in "Lucy is Envious"). This year produced some of my favorite episode, with everyone just getting up to misadventures around the apartment. No trips, no life-changing events, just two NYC couples living life. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Freddie2    828
4 hours ago, Mot Morenzi said:

Good observations. I like how you describe season three as the smallest. I take it you mean in terms of "event" episodes? If so, you're right that it's content just to play with things as they are, and isn't trying to constantly shake things up.

I love how settled everyone feels this season. Lucy and Ricky have the baby and the new apartment, and are obviously happy with what they have (except in "Lucy is Envious"). This year produced some of my favorite episode, with everyone just getting up to misadventures around the apartment. No trips, no life-changing events, just two NYC couples living life. 

Yes- no big events and most of the plots are very domestic. There isn’t even that much emphasis on Lucy wanting to get into show business, although that wouldn’t last long. It’s interesting how every season is so unique from the others but they all still flow together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mot Morenzi    1,467
6 hours ago, Freddie2 said:

Yes- no big events and most of the plots are very domestic. There isn’t even that much emphasis on Lucy wanting to get into show business, although that wouldn’t last long. It’s interesting how every season is so unique from the others but they all still flow together.

It's true. I can always tell which season I'm watching. Okay, the different apartment sets and Hollywood Hotel are major distinguishing factors, but I can also tell just by the tone of the episode which year it was from. Season 1 was zany silliness; 2 was more grounded and had Lucy and Ricky mature with the baby's arrival; 3 was the content season, with everyone adjusted to their new dynamics; 4 was the big event year, with Hollywood and big dreams on the horizon; 5 was everyone taking over the world; 6 was the Ricardos settling into middle age and the suburbs with a school-age child; and the hour longs were the guest-star spectaculars.

I'd never really thought of the evolution in those terms before, but it was a very logical progression from a young, married couple still starting out evolving into "two people who live together and like it." 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neil    1,325
4 hours ago, Mot Morenzi said:

It's true. I can always tell which season I'm watching. Okay, the different apartment sets and Hollywood Hotel are major distinguishing factors, but I can also tell just by the tone of the episode which year it was from. Season 1 was zany silliness; 2 was more grounded and had Lucy and Ricky mature with the baby's arrival; 3 was the content season, with everyone adjusted to their new dynamics; 4 was the big event year, with Hollywood and big dreams on the horizon; 5 was everyone taking over the world; 6 was the Ricardos settling into middle age and the suburbs with a school-age child; and the hour longs were the guest-star spectaculars.

I'd never really thought of the evolution in those terms before, but it was a very logical progression from a young, married couple still starting out evolving into "two people who live together and like it." 

Season three is so SOLID but what it's missing is a story arc.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neil    1,325

After the 5 (by my count)  story arcs in I Love Lucy did so well, I'm surprised there were NONE in The Lucy Show and only one in Here's Lucy---not counting 2-part episodes or Lucy's broken leg (arc forced on them).  I wish the 2nd season HL location shows had been better.  Too much bickering took the enjoyment of the 'fun' aspect out of the trip (contrast these with  Hollywood or Europe).   "Rapids" is probably the best one, but I like it more for the amazingly fearless stunts 59 year old Lucille Ball did than for the humor.   I've seen a picture of the "Rapids" set and there is a lucy body-double, so she may have been used for long shots---and when Lucy is yanked off the rock into the water.   That looks like the real Gale Gordon stepping into the raft and slipping head-first into the COLD COLD river.

Re: the comment about the Richardo's progression from young marrieds to middle-age.  Yes.  And it certainly happened FAST.  Fred and Ethel aged better than Lucy and Ricky.  1959 Desi barely resembles the boyish 34 year old in season 1, in looks or demeanor.  Lucy still looked great but the change in hairstyle made her look more matronly, though not tragically so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mot Morenzi    1,467
1 minute ago, Neil said:

Re: the comment about the Richardo's progression from young marrieds to middle-age.  Yes.  And it certainly happened FAST.  Fred and Ethel aged better than Lucy and Ricky.  1959 Desi barely resembles the boyish 34 year old in season 1, in looks or demeanor.  Lucy still looked great but the change in hairstyle made her look more matronly, though not tragically so. 

I'd never consciously registered that before, but you're absolutely right. Lucy and Ricky changed far more in appearance than Fred and Ethel did. If anything, Lucy grew older looking while Ethel got younger every year. Maybe Mrs. Mertz was slowly sucking the life out of Mrs. Ricardo through some enchantment Mrs. Trumbull taught her? (Neil, spinoff idea: Mrs. Trumbull is head of secret witches coven, along with Lucy's mother).

Desi suffered in particular. It's even more shocking when you see him a mere 7 years later on "The Mothers-in-Law" and realize he was only 50. Stress and alcohol make a potent ageing potion. Lucy still looked good by the end of the run, but the weariness around her eyes is striking. As well, the harsher lines on her face do give her a more stern countenance. Kusley's Kontraption did allow her to look considerably less worn-out for most of the hour longs, but it's unfortunate she couldn't have had a differently styled wig. The artichoke cut was not especially flattering on her. 

Vivian was positively glamorous during the final years. The elegant flipped hairstyles, the more expensive clothes. I know this was done at Vivian's request, and there's no denying how great she looked, but it's harder to believe she's Ethel when done up all fancy schmancy. Either Fred really loosened the purse strings during those final seasons, or Ethel had far more dresses than she ever let on. Or maybe she just hid Fred's glasses to steal from his money belt and didn't give them back until she'd had each dress a while.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neil    1,325

I remember seeing "Lucy Makes Room for Danny" at night in the summer when CBS ran the 13 as a series (for FIVE years, GodBlessEm).   They must have been running first season I Love Lucys during the day simultaneously.  Because I was surprised by the almost-menacingly scary volume and tone with which Ricky yells at Lucy was she emerges from the Williams' bedroom (specifically his reading of "LUCY!!!" ); as opposed to the less volatile 1951 Ricky. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mot Morenzi    1,467

Though you could explain away Little Ricky's switch from toddler to child over the course of one season as a continuity error, I think a more believable approach is that several years have passed between seasons 5 and 6. Lucy and Ricky's older looking appearance helps support that theory. Maybe that final half-hour season was closer to 1960 than 1957.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×