Luvsbway Posted August 12, 2020 Report Share Posted August 12, 2020 Review of the Queen of Tuesday book. Oh boy, will I be yelling back at this book. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/in-the-queen-of-tuesday-darin-strauss-dreams-up-an-affair-between-lucille-ball-and-his-grandfather/2020/08/10/347f8e04-db1f-11ea-b205-ff838e15a9a6_story.html Also I came across another book using Lucy's life for fiction called Lucy's Last Honeymoon in Havana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCarter Posted August 12, 2020 Report Share Posted August 12, 2020 I’m going to get it from the library because I don’t want to spend money on this book. I might be driven too crazy by the book to get through the whole thing. I know it’s “fictitious” or whatever, but I’m really tired of the narrative that Lucy was a washed up nobody before I Love Lucy began. Lucy was thinking about crawling back to Jamestown in 1949 because she’s an aging actress going nowhere? Ugh. 🙄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvsbway Posted August 12, 2020 Report Share Posted August 12, 2020 16 hours ago, HarryCarter said: I’m going to get it from the library because I don’t want to spend money on this book. I might be driven too crazy by the book to get through the whole thing. I know it’s “fictitious” or whatever, but I’m really tired of the narrative that Lucy was a washed up nobody before I Love Lucy began. Lucy was thinking about crawling back to Jamestown in 1949 because she’s an aging actress going nowhere? Ugh. 🙄 Same thoughts and I have it on hold at my library too. No way am I paying for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mot Morenzi Posted August 12, 2020 Report Share Posted August 12, 2020 It sounds like an interesting concept, to be sure, and I love the title, but historical fiction of this kind makes it easy for misinformation to spread. There are certainly people who will unfortunately take this as gospel. I hope his next book isn't a dramatic retelling of the years she was confined to bed due to RA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted August 12, 2020 Report Share Posted August 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Mot Morenzi said: It sounds like an interesting concept, to be sure, and I love the title, but historical fiction of this kind makes it easy for misinformation to spread. There are certainly people who will unfortunately take this as gospel. I hope his next book isn't a dramatic retelling of the years she was confined to bed due to RA. Well, why not? We could do that, too ...and some of us already have our "theories" about that period of her life anyway! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvsbway Posted August 13, 2020 Report Share Posted August 13, 2020 2 hours ago, JoeySoCal said: Well, why not? We could do that, too ...and some of us already have our "theories" about that period of her life anyway! Ah. Now that's the book I should write. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCarter Posted August 13, 2020 Report Share Posted August 13, 2020 Strauss has written an article for Vanity Fair about the cheating of Lucy's "big-boned spouse." 😐 https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2020/08/the-legendary-marriage-of-lucille-ball-and-desi-arnaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 6 hours ago, HarryCarter said: Strauss has written an article for Vanity Fair about the cheating of Lucy's "big-boned spouse." 😐 https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2020/08/the-legendary-marriage-of-lucille-ball-and-desi-arnaz Of all the ways I would think to describe Mr. Arnaz, "big boned" is not one of them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mot Morenzi Posted August 18, 2020 Report Share Posted August 18, 2020 On 8/13/2020 at 9:36 AM, JoeySoCal said: Well, why not? We could do that, too ...and some of us already have our "theories" about that period of her life anyway! I meant I hoped he wouldn’t write a book proclaiming the RA theory as factually correct. Chronicling other explanations for that time in her life would be another matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 20, 2020 Report Share Posted August 20, 2020 Queen of Tuesday "Winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 21, 2020 Report Share Posted August 21, 2020 4 hours ago, Neil said: Queen of Tuesday "Winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award" Correction: the smaller print above this reads "A New Novel From the ..." Reminds me of the time I bought a 99 cent My Fair Lady album that said in big print LOLA FISHER AND (next legible line) THE ORIGINAL BROADWAY CAST, without noting the VERY small print line in between "members of". Lola is better known to us as "Franchise Fiasco"'s Bunny Westcott. You should have seen the look on her face when a certain teenager told her he had her album! (wish I still did). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvsbway Posted August 22, 2020 Report Share Posted August 22, 2020 On 8/20/2020 at 9:21 PM, Neil said: Correction: the smaller print above this reads "A New Novel From the ..." Reminds me of the time I bought a 99 cent My Fair Lady album that said in big print LOLA FISHER AND (next legible line) THE ORIGINAL BROADWAY CAST, without noting the VERY small print line in between "members of". Lola is better known to us as "Franchise Fiasco"'s Bunny Westcott. You should have seen the look on her face when a certain teenager told her he had her album! (wish I still did). You have such fun stories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvsbway Posted September 7, 2020 Report Share Posted September 7, 2020 My review for The Queen of Tuesday. In this review I'm not going to review the storyline of the book, but rather the content. The author in his afterword says that he read many of the well known biographies on Lucille Ball to get an idea of who she was, but also admits to changing some facts and overall the Lucille portrayed in this book is his version. It certainly is because nowhere did I feel I was reading about the woman I've come to love for over 20 years. Lucille in this book is by 1950 a washed up actress who has not achieved fame or fortune in movies, her radio show has just been cancelled and she is now venturing into TV as one last shot to have a career. Lucy actually was doing very well in films by this point and making good money. She took a risk going into TV so her and Desi could be together more. The vaudeville act is a key plot point in the overall story of the affair with a man in NYC named Isidore. The act and subsequent I Love Lucy pilot are portrayed as failures. They weren't. The pilot sold the show and vaudeville sold them as a couple to the American people. Later in the 50s it has Lucille driving Desi out of the studio so she can take control, thus gaining back some of her self worth. In reality Lucy never had these ambitions and never wanted to run the studio. Lucy's marriage is a key point to the story and why she decides to have an affair. Even in the opening to the book in 1950 Desi's wandering eye and openness to cheat is portrayed. It continues to be a huge part of the rest of the book, and Desi makes no apologies for it, even throwing it back to Lucy why he does it. It makes Lucy despise Desi and do so for the next 10 years. It was rough in the late 50s but what this book never camptures about their marriage is how in love they were. They fought as hard as they made up. Desi's portrayal really pisses me off. Once the show gets big, he becomes an egotistical, demanding person because he is the top dog and wants everyone to cater to his ways. Many seem to fear him and he doesn't care (or even know half their names) because every show must be better than the last. In reality Desi was a wonderful boss, he knew all the employee's names( Lucy too), let the creative team do their work without interference, and when he thought something could be better he used his wonderful charm. The HUAC press conference at the ranch is used and again it's Desi being a jerk to Lucy, but sweet in front of the cameras. If you've ever read anything about that week, Desi was 100% on her side and fought for her. Then we have the problem of fact changing. The first being that the author knows Lucy was on Monday night but for some reason changes it to Tuesday. There is a long passage that uses Lucille's internal monologue about shooting the first episode, but the episode used is the first aired (not shot). Movie titles are thrown out to illustrate a point of Lucy being forgettable in films but uses films where she has some background bit part alongside a film like Lured where she was wonderful. I wonder if the author even watched any of her pre 1950 films. The author did change the date of Desi Jr's birth to fit the story and I'll say it was the first time I wanted to throw the book across the room for that reason. The overall story is a good one and there is a beautiful chapter with Lucille and Isidore that I enjoyed. What kills the story though is the author took real people, and their real life and career, changed so much about them and their world to fit the narrative. It would have been a much better book if he just made up a fictional husband and wife from the 1950s who had a #1 TV show, but a failing marriage behind the scenes. The reader would know you are talking about Lucy and Desi. What historical fiction in this case does is muddy the waters about Lucille Ball. I sincerely hope a reader doesn't pick up this book because they like I Love Lucy and think this is who Lucy and Desi really were and the events surrounding them happened the way portrayed. Two last thoughts. I was surprised Gary was mentioned. And Nanette Fabray??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mot Morenzi Posted September 7, 2020 Report Share Posted September 7, 2020 16 minutes ago, Luvsbway said: My review for The Queen of Tuesday. In this review I'm not going to review the storyline of the book, but rather the content. The author in his afterword says that he read many of the well known biographies on Lucille Ball to get an idea of who she was, but also admits to changing some facts and overall the Lucille portrayed in this book is his version. It certainly is because nowhere did I feel I was reading about the woman I've come to love for over 20 years. Lucille in this book is by 1950 a washed up actress who has not achieved fame or fortune in movies, her radio show has just been cancelled and she is now venturing into TV as one last shot to have a career. Lucy actually was doing very well in films by this point and making good money. She took a risk going into TV so her and Desi could be together more. The vaudeville act is a key plot point in the overall story of the affair with a man in NYC named Isidore. The act and subsequent I Love Lucy pilot are portrayed as failures. They weren't. The pilot sold the show and vaudeville sold them as a couple to the American people. Later in the 50s it has Lucille driving Desi out of the studio so she can take control, thus gaining back some of her self worth. In reality Lucy never had these ambitions and never wanted to run the studio. Lucy's marriage is a key point to the story and why she decides to have an affair. Even in the opening to the book in 1950 Desi's wandering eye and openness to cheat is portrayed. It continues to be a huge part of the rest of the book, and Desi makes no apologies for it, even throwing it back to Lucy why he does it. It makes Lucy despise Desi and do so for the next 10 years. It was rough in the late 50s but what this book never camptures about their marriage is how in love they were. They fought as hard as they made up. Desi's portrayal really pisses me off. Once the show gets big, he becomes an egotistical, demanding person because he is the top dog and wants everyone to cater to his ways. Many seem to fear him and he doesn't care (or even know half their names) because every show must be better than the last. In reality Desi was a wonderful boss, he knew all the employee's names( Lucy too), let the creative team do their work without interference, and when he thought something could be better he used his wonderful charm. The HUAC press conference at the ranch is used and again it's Desi being a jerk to Lucy, but sweet in front of the cameras. If you've ever read anything about that week, Desi was 100% on her side and fought for her. Then we have the problem of fact changing. The first being that the author knows Lucy was on Monday night but for some reason changes it to Tuesday. There is a long passage that uses Lucille's internal monologue about shooting the first episode, but the episode used is the first aired (not shot). Movie titles are thrown out to illustrate a point of Lucy being forgettable in films but uses films where she has some background bit part alongside a film like Lured where she was wonderful. I wonder if the author even watched any of her pre 1950 films. The author did change the date of Desi Jr's birth to fit the story and I'll say it was the first time I wanted to throw the book across the room for that reason. The overall story is a good one and there is a beautiful chapter with Lucille and Isidore that I enjoyed. What kills the story though is the author took real people, and their real life and career, changed so much about them and their world to fit the narrative. It would have been a much better book if he just made up a fictional husband and wife from the 1950s who had a #1 TV show, but a failing marriage behind the scenes. The reader would know you are talking about Lucy and Desi. What historical fiction in this case does is muddy the waters about Lucille Ball. I sincerely hope a reader doesn't pick up this book because they like I Love Lucy and think this is who Lucy and Desi really were and the events surrounding them happened the way portrayed. Two last thoughts. I was surprised Gary was mentioned. And Nanette Fabray??? Thanks for this. Your last paragraph sounds completely on the nose. Why not come up with your own characters instead of twisting and distorting the lives of real people to fit a fictional narrative? I think I’ll give this one a pass...or else wait for Lindsay Lohan to do the Lifetime Original Movie version. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvsbway Posted September 7, 2020 Report Share Posted September 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Mot Morenzi said: I think I’ll give this one a pass...or else wait for Lindsay Lohan to do the Lifetime Original Movie version. Ha! Yep Lindsey's walk through of the part would be a better version then the one in the book 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCarter Posted September 29, 2020 Report Share Posted September 29, 2020 A new I Love Lucy cookbook will be released in January. The I Love Lucy Cookbook: Classic Recipes Inspired by the Iconic TV Show https://www.amazon.com/dp/0762471808/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_fab_SWYCFb7Z3ETDH 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted October 6, 2020 Report Share Posted October 6, 2020 On 9/29/2020 at 5:45 AM, HarryCarter said: A new I Love Lucy cookbook will be released in January. The I Love Lucy Cookbook: Classic Recipes Inspired by the Iconic TV Show https://www.amazon.com/dp/0762471808/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_fab_SWYCFb7Z3ETDH The link doesn't work FYI "about:blank#blocked" 😯 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCarter Posted October 7, 2020 Report Share Posted October 7, 2020 Hopefully this link works: The I Love Lucy Cookbook: Classic Recipes Inspired by the Iconic TV Show https://www.amazon.com/dp/0762471808/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_fab_GWsFFb2CCZFBP 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted October 7, 2020 Report Share Posted October 7, 2020 18 hours ago, HarryCarter said: Hopefully this link works: The I Love Lucy Cookbook: Classic Recipes Inspired by the Iconic TV Show https://www.amazon.com/dp/0762471808/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_fab_GWsFFb2CCZFBP Yup! Thanks Jimmy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luvsbway Posted May 22, 2021 Report Share Posted May 22, 2021 On 11/27/2019 at 12:10 PM, Brock said: Jesus Christ... https://www.amazon.ca/Lucille-Ball-Desi-Arnaz-Ricardo/dp/1936003716/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=lucille+ball&qid=1574874382&sr=8-1 Brock said it. 576 pages in volume 1!!! What a piece of trash. It sounds like someone's vindictive fan faction about two people he truly hates. https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/lucille-ball-scandalous-past-book 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mot Morenzi Posted May 23, 2021 Report Share Posted May 23, 2021 16 hours ago, Luvsbway said: https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/lucille-ball-scandalous-past-book 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 Great, more garbage! Figures Faux News would be the reporter of this! Hope with the movie in the works this doesn't mean more of this kinda crap! Ugh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted June 3, 2021 Report Share Posted June 3, 2021 On 5/22/2021 at 8:34 AM, Luvsbway said: Brock said it. 576 pages in volume 1!!! What a piece of trash. It sounds like someone's vindictive fan faction about two people he truly hates. https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/lucille-ball-scandalous-past-book Darwin Porter is a trash writer, inventing dialogue between two people who were the only ones in the room and no notes were taken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
likewow Posted August 26, 2021 Report Share Posted August 26, 2021 I was in Barnes & Noble and was pleased to find the cookbook and two other books! Forever Lucy seems to be similar to the magazine of the same name. It has great photos, and a lot of errors. I was surprised to learn that William Frawley won 5 Emmys for playing Fred Mertz 😖 And that CBS cancelled "Life With Lucy"! The other book has good photos too and funny captions. I was glad to find these three new books to add to my collection of 'Lucy' books! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
likewow Posted August 26, 2021 Report Share Posted August 26, 2021 On 10/6/2020 at 9:48 PM, HarryCarter said: Hopefully this link works: The I Love Lucy Cookbook: Classic Recipes Inspired by the Iconic TV Show https://www.amazon.com/dp/0762471808/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_fab_GWsFFb2CCZFBP This cookbook is so pretty! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.