Brock Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 NEW RULE: In the interests of people on the Lounge with slower connections, please limit the size of photos (single or in combination) used in signatures to no more than 350 pixels in height and no more than 620 pixels in width TOTAL. Examples: 350 px in height compared with Taylor's signature: 660 px in width compared with HC's signature: If you're too tall or too wide, please resize it ASAP. Or at least by Wednesday. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 NEW RULE: In the interests of people on the Lounge with slower connections, please limit the size of photos (single or in combination) used in signatures to no more than 350 pixels in height and no more than 620 pixels in width TOTAL. Examples: 350 px in height compared with Taylor's signature: 620 px in width compared with HC's signature: If you're too tall or too wide, please resize it ASAP. Or at least by Wednesday. Thanks. Ok, i'll be more careful when posting images, LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuttyNose Posted October 24, 2011 Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 Brock..I think that's great. It's annoying to have to scroll over enormous sigline pics if a "perp" is posting more than once in a thread. I know there are some boards that post the sigline once, and then not again during a thread, and/or giving the options for posters not to see ANY siggie pics at all. Now, if only we could get people not to repost large groups of photos with their comments within photo-heavy threads, and just comment on the pic or learn to just post the pic fron the group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Posted December 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 It seems this thread needs to be bumped for a certain individual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 It seems this thread needs to be bumped for a certain individual. I'm fixing it! It was just a test. Jeez! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 I'm fixing it! It was just a test. Jeez! Boy, trouble IS your middle name, isn't it? LOL! In your defence, i think that beautiful pic of gorgeous Doris was worth breaking the rules for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 Boy, trouble IS your middle name, isn't it? LOL! In your defence, i think that beautiful pic of gorgeous Doris was worth breaking the rules for. I know, right? THANK YOU!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 I know, right? THANK YOU!!! I may be gay but i do get feelings down there when they look like THAT!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 I may be gay but i do get feelings down there when they look like THAT!!!!! Okay, THAT I didn't need to know! (Besides, she's like near 90 now, does that help you tingle any??) JEESH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 Okay, THAT I didn't need to know! (Besides, she's like near 90 now, does that help you tingle any??) JEESH! I was referring to Doris at the time THAT picture was taken, she must really look bad now not wanting to ever be seen anywhere by her public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickee Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 I was referring to Doris at the time THAT picture was taken, she must really look bad now not wanting to ever be seen anywhere by her public. Don't assume the worst...just her preference to stay out of the spotlight; a VERY private woman. This is from a few years back and while a candid...IMO, she looks great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Posted December 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 I'm fixing it! It was just a test. Jeez! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 Don't assume the worst...just her preference to stay out of the spotlight; a VERY private woman. This is from a few years back and while a candid...IMO, she looks great! I just said that to provoke someone posting a more recent pic, and my scheeme worked!!! How Lucy Ricardo of me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 Don't assume the worst...just her preference to stay out of the spotlight; a VERY private woman. This is from a few years back and while a candid...IMO, she looks great! I see she's let her hair grow Ginger Rogers/Mae West style, LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leenorman Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 Don't assume the worst...just her preference to stay out of the spotlight; a VERY private woman. This is from a few years back and while a candid...IMO, she looks great! WE ALL LOVE DORIS; but, geez, if you think she looks GREAT here; I guess I'll have to apply for the Sports Illustrated swinsuit edition....NOT!!!! Leave her to her peace; that, which she has fought so long to protect. God Love Her!!!!!1 Regards, JK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leenorman Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 Brock..I think that's great. It's annoying to have to scroll over enormous sigline pics if a "perp" is posting more than once in a thread. I know there are some boards that post the sigline once, and then not again during a thread, and/or giving the options for posters not to see ANY siggie pics at all. Now, if only we could get people not to repost large groups of photos with their comments within photo-heavy threads, and just comment on the pic or learn to just post the pic fron the group. PLUS................ when reply is hit for a comment; we go through it all over again; some days, two or three replies take up a whole page. I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THE LUCY LOUNGE; but, some days my time is taken up more than 45 minutes or so....I just simply cannot resist reading every one's opinions....Love, JK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.