rickee Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Oh these are all amazing, the hair rarely changed but why are some fuzzier than others, especially noticeable in color? Although Joe is correct, sometimes capturing a moving image is not that easy, I suspect some grabs are not taken from the official, restored DVDs, because they are not out yet. Most likely taken from his personal copies. (Right Jim?) Nevertheless...great timelines and fantastic job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Although Joe is correct, sometimes capturing a moving image is not that easy, I suspect some grabs are not taken from the official, restored DVDs, because they are not out yet. Most likely taken from his personal copies. (Right Jim?) Nevertheless...great timelines and fantastic job! Yes, of course it was a GREAT job and i always wanted to see that comparison, year to year, now the blurring i thought was gauze on the lens so i'm relieved it's just a blurred image. Now Sir, you being an expert on these thins, tell me, why did Lucy look so so on Life with Lucy but then she went on with Joan Rivers and looked sensational, what's the story behind that mystery, please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCarter Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Lucy and Nanette once even competed for Emmys, but they had no history together, it was probably asshole peter marshall who sowed descent between them on the set. I think he's been quoted even as saying to her and Carney that they would regret the experience of working with her or words to that effect. I'm sure HE was the reason she never turned up on Hollywood Squares, a show she loved. Nanette claims on her Happy Anniversary and Goodbye DVD that she had to refilm her big scene because (she implied) she was overshadowing Lucy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCarter Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Although Joe is correct, sometimes capturing a moving image is not that easy, I suspect some grabs are not taken from the official, restored DVDs, because they are not out yet. Most likely taken from his personal copies. (Right Jim?) Nevertheless...great timelines and fantastic job! Thanks! That is correct. I had to use some of my home taped Here's Lucy copies for the last two seasons that weren't on DVD yet. The last Lucy Show is from a public domain release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Nanette claims on her Happy Anniversary and Goodbye DVD that she had to refilm her big scene because (she implied) she was overshadowing Lucy. Well, the beatch should have known NOT to do that, LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Thanks! That is correct. I had to use some of my home taped Here's Lucy copies for the last two seasons that weren't on DVD yet. The last Lucy Show is from a public domain release. OMG, never even thought of that, sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickee Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Yes, of course it was a GREAT job and i always wanted to see that comparison, year to year, now the blurring i thought was gauze on the lens so i'm relieved it's just a blurred image. Now Sir, you being an expert on these thins, tell me, why did Lucy look so so on Life with Lucy but then she went on with Joan Rivers and looked sensational, what's the story behind that mystery, please? No real mystery...just bad lighting and amazingly, not a whole lot attention paid to it, as they should have. Go back to the very first I Love Lucy episodes and you'll kind of see the same thing. Over the years, special attention was paid every closer to making Lucy look even better and it showed...than when she first went on the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 24, 2011 Report Share Posted December 24, 2011 No real mystery...just bad lighting and amazingly, not a whole lot attention paid to it, as they should have. Go back to the very first I Love Lucy episodes and you'll kind of see the same thing. Over the years, special attention was paid every closer to making Lucy look even better and it showed...than when she first went on the air. So, you're saying Joan Rivers, on her own show, made sure her guests looked great, same for herself i assume, but on Life with Lucy, they didn't spend the time or make the effort to photograph her in a better light? I noticed that thing that older Hollywood stars have of being interviewed with a lamp and dark setting, as in Lucy's with Rona Barrett, is that the ultimate in lighting achievement? Barbara Walters is famous for having a lens that takes away the years also, and i noticed she looks much better some times than others, even today, walking on on The View, her age did not show on her face but in her walking over to the desk alone, guess they can't mask everything in show business, LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Posted December 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2011 A trio of comedy goddesses: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Posted December 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 27, 2011 Report Share Posted December 27, 2011 . . . AND AN ASSHOLE IN A PEAR TREE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Posted December 28, 2011 Report Share Posted December 28, 2011 Kind of a 2-faced little weasel, isn't he? Thought he said he didn't actually like Lucy (here he is munching on her) or think she was capable of being a comedienne (or some other sexist comment that women can't be funny). Never did like Jerry Lewis myself. He's got diarrhea mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 28, 2011 Report Share Posted December 28, 2011 Kind of a 2-faced little weasel, isn't he? Thought he said he didn't actually like Lucy (here he is munching on her) or think she was capable of being a comedienne (or some other sexist comment that women can't be funny). Never did like Jerry Lewis myself. He's got diarrhea mouth. I agree, never liked him either, E V E R ! Dino was the great one in that duo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 Well! So apparently he was fond of her at one point....wonder whut happen?? Hmmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 Probably nothing. Lewis is an arsehole, even today. Look at the crap he constantly spews from his mouth. He was probably jealous that Lucy liked Dean better. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 29, 2011 Report Share Posted December 29, 2011 Probably nothing. Lewis is an arsehole, even today. Look at the crap he constantly spews from his mouth. He was probably jealous that Lucy liked Dean better. LOL Exactly what i was going to say. Have no idea what the frogs see in him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Posted December 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Let's extend this Jerry Lewis love-in for a few more minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Let's extend this Jerry Lewis love-in for a few more minutes. What's THAT one from, Danny Thomas' tribute to vaudeville special? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Dear God, look at Lewis' teeth. Yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeySanJoaquin Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 What's THAT one from, Danny Thomas' tribute to vaudeville special? Wow, Irma outdid herself with that one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Wow, Irma outdid herself with that one! I know, Lucy looks so sexy, so different, so Southern, Platinum Magnolia i guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C L A U D E Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 Dear God, look at Lewis' teeth. Yikes. Fakes, just like the rest of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Posted January 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mmadluv7 Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 you know what? I had bought this picture and I edited and cropped it, which is actually larger than whats shown. I put it on the blog, and it took off. Since then, I've seen magnets, sketches, and pictures all from this cropped pic. Its funny cus something can never be seen before, or rarely seen by the public- One post on a blog and its worldwide now. I feel good that its popular, but I feel bad that I didn't put the proper watermark on it, so people could see where it came from. i'LL POST ANOTHER FROM (oops) this photo shoot- hopefully you all will like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magster Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 Just gorgeous! This is obviously 1940s but does anyone know more specifically? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.